Quali report

Drivers progressed through the qualifying session as follows:

Going from Q1 to Q2:

  • MAG failed to improve his time, recording 89.623 compared to 89.594 (0.029s slower)

  • VAN failed to improve his time, recording 90.525 compared to 90.479 (0.046s slower)

Going from Q2 to Q3:

  • HUL failed to improve his time, recording 89.57 compared to 89.187 (0.383s slower)

  • SAI failed to improve his time, recording 89.986 compared to 89.802 (0.184s slower)

The official session results were recorded as follows:

POS

DRIVER

Q1

Q2

Q3

1

VET

1:29.060 (2)

1:28.341 (1)

1:27.958 (1)

2

RAI

1:28.951 (1)

1:28.515 (3)

1:28.101 (2)

3

BOT

1:29.275 (3)

1:28.794 (4)

1:28.124 (3)

4

HAM

1:29.396 (5)

1:28.458 (2)

1:28.220 (4)

5

RIC

1:29.552 (6)

1:28.962 (5)

1:28.398 (5)

6

GAS

1:30.121 (9)

1:29.836 (9)

1:29.329 (6)

7

MAG

1:29.594 (7)

1:29.623 (7)

1:29.358 (7)

8

HUL

1:30.260 (11)

1:29.187 (6)

1:29.570 (8)

9

OCO

1:30.338 (12)

1:30.009 (10)

1:29.874 (9)

10

SAI

1:29.893 (8)

1:29.802 (8)

1:29.986 (10)

11

HAR

1:30.412 (13)

1:30.105 (11)

12

PER

1:30.218 (10)

1:30.156 (12)

13

ALO

1:30.530 (15)

1:30.212 (13)

14

VAN

1:30.479 (14)

1:30.525 (14)

15

VER

1:29.374 (4)

16

GRO

1:30.530 (15)

17

ERI

1:31.063 (17)

18

SIR

1:31.414 (18)

19

LEC

1:31.420 (19)

20

STR

1:31.503 (20)

Session Utilisation

Activity throughout the three qualification sessions took place as follows:

Q1

Cut-off Time Evolution

The cut-off time in Q1 evolved as follows:

Q2

Cut-off Time Evolution

The cut-off time in Q2 evolved as follows:

Q3

Front Row Cut-off Time Evolution

The cut-off time in Q3 evolved as follows:

To learn how to wrangle F1 results and timing data to create charts like these, see f1datajunkie.com or buy the Wrangling F1 Data With R book.

PreviousQualifyingNextRace

Last updated