Quali report
Drivers progressed through the qualifying session as follows:
Going from Q1 to Q2:
    MAG failed to improve his time, recording 89.623 compared to 89.594 (0.029s slower)
    VAN failed to improve his time, recording 90.525 compared to 90.479 (0.046s slower)
Going from Q2 to Q3:
    HUL failed to improve his time, recording 89.57 compared to 89.187 (0.383s slower)
    SAI failed to improve his time, recording 89.986 compared to 89.802 (0.184s slower)
The official session results were recorded as follows:
POS
DRIVER
Q1
Q2
Q3
1
VET
1:29.060 (2)
1:28.341 (1)
1:27.958 (1)
2
RAI
1:28.951 (1)
1:28.515 (3)
1:28.101 (2)
3
BOT
1:29.275 (3)
1:28.794 (4)
1:28.124 (3)
4
HAM
1:29.396 (5)
1:28.458 (2)
1:28.220 (4)
5
RIC
1:29.552 (6)
1:28.962 (5)
1:28.398 (5)
6
GAS
1:30.121 (9)
1:29.836 (9)
1:29.329 (6)
7
MAG
1:29.594 (7)
1:29.623 (7)
1:29.358 (7)
8
HUL
1:30.260 (11)
1:29.187 (6)
1:29.570 (8)
9
OCO
1:30.338 (12)
1:30.009 (10)
1:29.874 (9)
10
SAI
1:29.893 (8)
1:29.802 (8)
1:29.986 (10)
11
HAR
1:30.412 (13)
1:30.105 (11)
12
PER
1:30.218 (10)
1:30.156 (12)
13
ALO
1:30.530 (15)
1:30.212 (13)
14
VAN
1:30.479 (14)
1:30.525 (14)
15
VER
1:29.374 (4)
16
GRO
1:30.530 (15)
17
ERI
1:31.063 (17)
18
SIR
1:31.414 (18)
19
LEC
1:31.420 (19)
20
STR
1:31.503 (20)

Session Utilisation

Activity throughout the three qualification sessions took place as follows:

Q1

Cut-off Time Evolution

The cut-off time in Q1 evolved as follows:

Q2

Cut-off Time Evolution

The cut-off time in Q2 evolved as follows:

Q3

Front Row Cut-off Time Evolution

The cut-off time in Q3 evolved as follows:
To learn how to wrangle F1 results and timing data to create charts like these, see f1datajunkie.com or buy the Wrangling F1 Data With R book.