Quali report
Drivers progressed through the qualifying session as follows:
Going from Q1 to Q2:
  • MAG failed to improve his time, recording 89.623 compared to 89.594 (0.029s slower)
  • VAN failed to improve his time, recording 90.525 compared to 90.479 (0.046s slower)
Going from Q2 to Q3:
  • HUL failed to improve his time, recording 89.57 compared to 89.187 (0.383s slower)
  • SAI failed to improve his time, recording 89.986 compared to 89.802 (0.184s slower)
The official session results were recorded as follows:
POS
DRIVER
Q1
Q2
Q3
1
VET
1:29.060 (2)
1:28.341 (1)
1:27.958 (1)
2
RAI
1:28.951 (1)
1:28.515 (3)
1:28.101 (2)
3
BOT
1:29.275 (3)
1:28.794 (4)
1:28.124 (3)
4
HAM
1:29.396 (5)
1:28.458 (2)
1:28.220 (4)
5
RIC
1:29.552 (6)
1:28.962 (5)
1:28.398 (5)
6
GAS
1:30.121 (9)
1:29.836 (9)
1:29.329 (6)
7
MAG
1:29.594 (7)
1:29.623 (7)
1:29.358 (7)
8
HUL
1:30.260 (11)
1:29.187 (6)
1:29.570 (8)
9
OCO
1:30.338 (12)
1:30.009 (10)
1:29.874 (9)
10
SAI
1:29.893 (8)
1:29.802 (8)
1:29.986 (10)
11
HAR
1:30.412 (13)
1:30.105 (11)
12
PER
1:30.218 (10)
1:30.156 (12)
13
ALO
1:30.530 (15)
1:30.212 (13)
14
VAN
1:30.479 (14)
1:30.525 (14)
15
VER
1:29.374 (4)
16
GRO
1:30.530 (15)
17
ERI
1:31.063 (17)
18
SIR
1:31.414 (18)
19
LEC
1:31.420 (19)
20
STR
1:31.503 (20)

Session Utilisation

Activity throughout the three qualification sessions took place as follows:

Q1

Cut-off Time Evolution

The cut-off time in Q1 evolved as follows:

Q2

Cut-off Time Evolution

The cut-off time in Q2 evolved as follows:
Could not load image

Q3

Front Row Cut-off Time Evolution

The cut-off time in Q3 evolved as follows:
To learn how to wrangle F1 results and timing data to create charts like these, see f1datajunkie.com or buy the Wrangling F1 Data With R book.
Last modified 3yr ago