Quali report
Drivers progressed through the qualifying session as follows:
Going from Q1 to Q2:
- MAG failed to improve his time, recording 89.623 compared to 89.594 (0.029s slower)
- VAN failed to improve his time, recording 90.525 compared to 90.479 (0.046s slower)
Going from Q2 to Q3:
- HUL failed to improve his time, recording 89.57 compared to 89.187 (0.383s slower)
- SAI failed to improve his time, recording 89.986 compared to 89.802 (0.184s slower)
The official session results were recorded as follows:
POS
DRIVER
Q1
Q2
Q3
1
VET
1:29.060 (2)
1:28.341 (1)
1:27.958 (1)
2
RAI
1:28.951 (1)
1:28.515 (3)
1:28.101 (2)
3
BOT
1:29.275 (3)
1:28.794 (4)
1:28.124 (3)
4
HAM
1:29.396 (5)
1:28.458 (2)
1:28.220 (4)
5
RIC
1:29.552 (6)
1:28.962 (5)
1:28.398 (5)
6
GAS
1:30.121 (9)
1:29.836 (9)
1:29.329 (6)
7
MAG
1:29.594 (7)
1:29.623 (7)
1:29.358 (7)
8
HUL
1:30.260 (11)
1:29.187 (6)
1:29.570 (8)
9
OCO
1:30.338 (12)
1:30.009 (10)
1:29.874 (9)
10
SAI
1:29.893 (8)
1:29.802 (8)
1:29.986 (10)
11
HAR
1:30.412 (13)
1:30.105 (11)
​
12
PER
1:30.218 (10)
1:30.156 (12)
​
13
ALO
1:30.530 (15)
1:30.212 (13)
​
14
VAN
1:30.479 (14)
1:30.525 (14)
​
15
VER
1:29.374 (4)
​
​
16
GRO
1:30.530 (15)
​
​
17
ERI
1:31.063 (17)
​
​
18
SIR
1:31.414 (18)
​
​
19
LEC
1:31.420 (19)
​
​
20
STR
1:31.503 (20)
​
​
Session Utilisation
Activity throughout the three qualification sessions took place as follows:
Q1
Cut-off Time Evolution
The cut-off time in Q1 evolved as follows:
Q2
Cut-off Time Evolution
The cut-off time in Q2 evolved as follows:
Could not load image
Q3
Front Row Cut-off Time Evolution
The cut-off time in Q3 evolved as follows:
To learn how to wrangle F1 results and timing data to create charts like these, see f1datajunkie.com or buy the Wrangling F1 Data With R book.
Last modified 3yr ago